Saturday 19 July 2003
DNA somatic mutations, poor DNA repair and aging
As proteins in the cell are used for numerous vital functions, the cell becomes slowly impaired and eventually dies. When enough cells in an organ reach such a state, the organ itself will become compromised and the symptoms of disease begin to manifest.
Experimental studies in animals, where genes associated with DNA repair were silenced, resulted in accelerated aging, early manifestation of age related diseases and increased susceptibility to cancer.
Longevity genes and DNA repair
Most lifespan influencing genes affect the rate of DNA damageCertain genes are known to influence variation in lifespan within a population of organisms. Studies in model organisms such as yeast, worms, flies and mice have identified single genes, which when modified, can double lifespan (eg. a mutation in the age-1 gene of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans).
These genes are known to be associated specifically with cell functions other than DNA repair, but when the pathways that they influence are followed to their final destination, it was observed that they mediate one of three functions: increasing the rate of DNA repair, increasing the rate of antioxidant production, or decreasing the rate of oxidant production.
Therefore, the common pattern across most lifespan influencing genes is in their downstream effect of altering the rate of DNA damage.
Caloric restriction increases DNA repair
Caloric restriction (CR) has been shown to increase lifespan and decrease age related disease in all organisms where it has been studied, from single celled life such as yeast, to multicellular organisms such as worms, flies, mice and primates.
The mechanism by which CR works is associated with a number of genes related to nutrient sensing which signal the cell to alter metabolic activity when there is a shortage of nutrients, particularly carbohydrates.
When the cell senses a decrease in carbohydrate availability, activation of the lifespan influencing genes DAF-2, AGE-1 and SIR-2 is triggered.
The reason why a shortage of nutrients will induce in a cell a state of increased DNA repair and an increase in lifespan is suggested to be associated with an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of cellular hibernation.
Essentially this permits a cell to maintain a dormant state until conditions that are more favorable are met. During this period, the cell must decrease its normal rate of metabolism and one of the ways it can accomplish this is by reducing genomic instability.
Thus, the cellular rate of aging is mutable and can be influenced by environmental factors such as nutrient availability, which mediate their effect by altering the rate of DNA repair.
energy and caloric consomption
mitochondrial DNA mutations
- See Carrard G, et al: Impairment of proteasome structure and function in aging. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 34:1461, 2002.
Fraga MF, Esteller M. Epigenetics and aging: the targets and the marks. Trends Genet. 2007 Aug;23(8):413-8. PMID: 17559965
Bishop NA, Guarente L. Genetic links between diet and lifespan: shared mechanisms from yeast to humans. Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Nov;8(11):835-44. PMID: 17909538
Russell SJ, Kahn CR. Endocrine regulation of ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Sep;8(9):681-91. PMID: 17684529
Christensen K, Johnson TE, Vaupel JW. The quest for genetic determinants of human longevity: challenges and insights. Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jun;7(6):436-48. PMID: 16708071
Finkel T. Opinion: Radical medicine: treating ageing to cure disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Dec;6(12):971-6. PMID: 16227974
Balducci L, Ershler WB. Cancer and ageing: a nexus at several levels. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Aug;5(8):655-62. PMID: 16056261
Blasco MA. Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Aug;6(8):611-22. PMID: 16136653
Longo VD, Mitteldorf J, Skulachev VP. Opinion: programmed and altruistic ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Nov;6(11):866-72. PMID: 16304601
Kirkwood TB. Genes that shape the course of ageing. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Oct;14(8):345-7. PMID: 14516929
Campisi J. Related Articles, Links ageing: rival demons? Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 May;3(5):339-49. PMID: 12724732
Carrard G, et al: Impairment of proteasome structure and function in aging. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 34:1461, 2002.
Helfand SL, Inouye SK. Rejuvenating views of the ageing process. Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Feb;3(2):149-53. PMID: 11836509
Campisi J. Cancer and ageing: rival demons? Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 May;3(5):339-49. PMID: 12724732
Kuro-o M. Disease model: human aging. Trends Mol Med. 2001 Apr;7(4):179-81. PMID: 11286943
Jazwinski SM. Metabolic control and ageing. Trends Genet. 2000 Nov;16(11):506-11. PMID: 11074293
Vijg J. Somatic mutations and aging: a re-evaluation. Mutat Res. 2000 Jan 17;447(1):117-35. PMID: 10686308
Lightowlers RN, Jacobs HT, Kajander OA. Mitochondrial DNA—all things bad? Trends Genet. 1999 Mar;15(3):91-3. PMID: 10203801
Guarente L, Kenyon C: Genetic pathways that regulate ageing in model organisms. Nature 408:255, 2000.
Finkel T, Holbrook NJ: Oxidants, oxidative stress, and the biology of ageing. Nature 408:239, 2000.
Gilchrest BA, Bohr VA: Aging processes, DNA damage, and repair. FASEB J 11:322, 1997.